PROTECTING YOUR
RIGHT TO
HAVE THE CHILDREN STAY
In New Jersey
the trend has been to liberalize the process to allow out of state
relocation with children. The rationale is that if the non-custodial
parent can move anywhere, why not allow the custodial parent the
same freedom? The logic would work if the original settlement
agreement was silent on the issue of proximity, but lost in this
process is the non-custodial parent’s right to get what
they specifically agreed to in the Property Settlement Agreement
entered into at the time of divorce, which is to be close to the
kids. Perhaps they agreed to give more support so the family stays
in New Jersey. Two months later the custodial parent takes the
money and runs! You lose your family and your money. My suggestion
is to build a restriction into the agreement such as a minimum
time period the custodial parent must stay local. This way, everyone
is clear what they bargained for, they struck.
IS THAT A DETECTIVE OR TEACHER?
Although the
Supreme Court gives students the constitutional protection in
the classroom, these rights have diminished. The need for warrants
before searching a students belongings and probable cause have
been replaced with “reasonable” grounds as a standard
for search. Today, public schools and police duties are overlapping
resulting in schools being extensions of law enforcement. Public
schools are required to develop procedures to initiate and conduct
searches of students, their property and personal property. Schools
must cooperate in conducting undercover operations in schools.
Teachers now have a right to search students , interrogate students
and to preserve evidence belonging to the student. They must refer
all possible criminal matters to the police no matter how trivial.
This may sound like a good policy but problems, previously handled
by the administration for minor offenses, are now going to juvenile
court. Children should be aware of their rights. Get a handbook
of students’ rights.
WHO GETS THE DOG?
Judges are
not happy when an attorney raises questions regarding the family
pet and visitation. Nonetheless, there are some legitimate reasons
why they arise. Let’s face it, pets give unconditional love.
They are loyal, affectionate and playful. The opposite of how
one sees their spouse while divorcing! In 1944, the Court in Ill.
found it would be a “tragedy” to give the dog to the
wife if the love, affection and loyalty are for the husband. (
I wonder how they proved their case). California looks to whom
the pet is registered. Most states regard pets as chattel and
distribute accordingly (Imagine!) Rhode Island has a statute as
to Guardianship of pets. A Memphis Court held a trial for custody
and ruled that the pick up and drop off of the dog was to be at
the local kennel. Colorado has awarded dog support. Alaska gave
a husband full custody and the wife visitation and said the husband
does not have to consult with the wife regarding medical treatment
for the dog. Recently, in NJ an attorney reported that a couple
decided to participate in binding arbitration to resolve custody
of the dog. Mere cost in attorney’s fees....$10,000. My
suggestion, as the children go...so goes the family pet. If no
children, call me, I’ll mediate!
BATTERED WOMEN’S SYNDROME
In two recently
decided cases, the Supreme Court permitted women to rely on this
“syndrome” to defend against crimes committed against
someone other than their tormentors. In one case, a woman who
abused her stepson, claimed that her husband abused her physically
and coerced her into performing certain acts to the stepson in
his presence. In the second case, the defendant claimed the defense
of duress to explain why she stole money for six years. She claimed
her son abused her and threatened her.
The end result: Battered women may be found to lack criminal culpability
when their batterers force them to commit crimes.
BANKRUPTCY
ISSUES IN DIVORCE:
Bankruptcy
cases may require application of matrimonial law to:
1.Determine the property of the bankruptcy estate- If a debtor
files a bankruptcy petition after the entry of a Judgment of Divorce
which requires transfer of property to the non-debtor spouse,
the debtor holds the property in a constructive trust and the
property is excluded from the bankruptcy estate.
2. Determine the effect of the automatic stay- The filing of a
bankruptcy petition “stays” or holds off the determination
of the interests of a debtor to the property subject to equitable
distribution.
3. Sale of marital property in the bankruptcy-A trustee in bankruptcy
may sell property jointly owned by the debtor and non-debtor spouse
subject to certain conditions.
4. Treatment of alimony and child support-A bankruptcy discharge
does not discharge an individual debtor from any debt owed to
a spouse, former spouse or child of the debtor for alimony, support
or maintenance.
Caveat: In order to avoid losing retirement benefits, I have had
clients earmark the retirement account for child support so it
would not be discharged in bankruptcy. It worked!
CASES
IN THE NEWS
SALE
OF MARITAL ASSETS
In
June, 2005, New Jersey courts ruled that a court can order the
sale of the marital residence/assets prior to the final divorce.
Prior to this, courts could not order the sale of marital assets
absent extenuating circumstances. This could allow a spouse to
secure money for future housing or education; It can also provide
a cushion to help meet unexpected needs during the divorce such
as repairs or a much needed vacation!
Domestic
Partner Issues:
The
non-childbearing mother can now be named as a second mother on
the child’s birth certificate. New Jersey is the fifth state
to acknowledge a non-biological parent of the same sex, who consents
to the partner’s artificial insemination.
A
trial judge has decided that same-sex partners registered under
the Domestic Partnership Act can win damages for loss of consortium.
You can only claim damages after a couple registers under the
act.
Pursuant
to New Jersey’s Domestic Partnership Act a woman recently
sued a county surrogate for refusing to recognize her as her deceased
partner’s heir and estate representative. Under the Probate
code, a spouse would be able to administer her spouse’s
estate, there would be no bond requirement and there would be
rights of inheritance. I’ll keep you posted as to the outcome
of this case!